INTERPRETTING DISKMARK 6.0 SCORES PRO
INTERPRETTING DISKMARK 6.0 SCORES PLUS

Random read/write performance appears to be the Pilot-E’s Achilles heel as it came in dead last. Seagate’s FireCuda 510 blew everything else out of the water in this area, but the Pilot-E did manage to come in second. The Mushkin’s Pilot-E also showed strong write performance.

INTERPRETTING DISKMARK 6.0 SCORES PRO

It turned in the second-fastest read performance with only the more expensive Samsung SSD 970 Pro edging it out by a negligible amount. Kicking things off with Crystal DiskMark 6.0’s sequential read and write test shows the Mushkin Pilot-E performing extremely well against the competition. Our sister site PCMag tested out one of Mushkin’s Pilot-E 1TB drives with a handful of benchmarks.

The slightly higher price and the theoretical performance of these drives place them into more of a middle ground in the wider SSD market. The 1TB model also carries a 650TBW durability rating, which is a significant improvement over Mushkin’s older 1TB Pilot.Ĭharging between 13 to 15 cents per GB, these drives aren’t exactly the least expensive SSD solutions available on the market today. The 1TB model that we will focus on in this review comes with 1GB of RAM.Īll told, this hardware is capable of achieving data speeds as high as 3,500MB/s while reading data and 3,000MHz while writing. Mushkin also equipped these drives with DDR4 SK Hynix RAM to further enhance performance. The PCB is outfitted with Micron second-gen 64-layer 3D TLC NAND, which is connected to a Silicon Motion SM2262EN controller. DesignĪs a simple M.2 SSD without a heatsink, the Pilot-E drives don’t stand out from an appearance perspective. Although these aren’t the cheapest SSDs you can currently buy, their strong performance relative to their price makes them highly appealing. Benchmark: PassMark PerformanceTest 9.Mushkin’s Pilot-E SSDs were designed to be budget-friendly solutions that also don’t compromise performance. Introduction, Packaging, SpecificationsĨ. For some context, the mainstream Crucial MX500 500GB had results of 155.76MB/s, 434.76MB/s, 488.07MB/s, and 73.11MB/s, in the same respective order.ġ. Finally, the Gigabyte UD PRO 256GB had better numbers in three of the four tests at 100.34MB/s, 307.69MB/s, 447.29MB/s, and 65.47MB/s speeds. The Kingston UV500 240GB posted better numbers in all tests with scores of 76.80MB/s, 343.02MB/s, 422.85MB/s, and 80.60MB/s. For comparison's sake, another budget drive, the Crucial BX500 480GB, provided results of 23.93MB/s, 152.34MB/s, 394.95MB/s, and 58.10MB/s. With results of 18.84MB/s, 142.98MB/s, 407.72MB/s, and 65.94MB/s, these revealed the budget nature of the P200. Overall, the Patriot P200 512GB performance was underwhelming to say the least. However, it also requires high IOPS capabilities for the best score. Obviously, PassMark PerformanceTest 9.0 uses highly compressible data in most tests some controllers can really take advantage of. To make things clear to you, the first graph simulates a database server, followed by a file server, web server, and workstation. It also provides valuable insight in simulating real world performance applications. PassMark PerformanceTest 9.0's Advanced Disk Test generates some superb graphs right out of the box. The results of all completed tests may be graphed using our custom graphing components.

INTERPRETTING DISKMARK 6.0 SCORES PLUS

Sequential or random access (seeking plus reading and writing) The choice of four access methods - C/C++ API, Win32 API cached / uncached and raw disk access. Larger blocks mean less requests and can lead to an improvement in performance. The size of the data block used for each read or write request. Larger files mean that the system cache has less of an effect on the test types, which use caching (see below). Users have the ability to test multiple drives at the same time using multiple threads, and specify: Including IDE drives, SCSI, RAID, USB key drives, SATA, networked shared drives and external drives. The test supports any drive that can be mounted under Windows.

There are quite a few factors which have a bearing on this speed and the Advanced Disk Drive Test allows the user to vary most of these factors and compare the results. The speed that data can be transferred between memory and a hard disk drive is one of a system's most important performance aspects. This Advanced Disk Test, which is part of PerformanceTest, measures the data transfer speed when reading or writing data to one or more disks. Benchmark: PassMark PerformanceTest 9.0

Interpretting diskmark 6.0 scores